As I and others grew up in church, bible stories that we
would read from each week were given, read and discussed in Sunday school.
These would be portrayed as literally true, with no evaluation or critical
thinking about the story perhaps not being an historical event, but rather
metaphorical. Verses were memorised in exchange for sweets or other rewards every
Sunday when I was very young, to stories of God’s literal provision of the
various characters in the books of the bible as I got older. As far as I can remember,
no one ever outright explicitly stated, or even hinted, that some qualified
people and Christians around the world do not take large portions of the bible
as literally true and perhaps therefore, neither should we.
Studying science and biology as I got older and at university,
I began to find evidence that conflicted with the literal stories and words
within the bible, such as the genetic evidence for the impossibility of the whole
human race having two ancestors by which they descended. (I don’t intend to
discuss the evidence here, but suffice it to say, the evidence against the
literal existence of Adam and Eve is clear-cut and anyone can contact me if
they need further convincing.)
Further reading by myself on history and linguistics, seemed
to cast huge doubt on stories in the bible book of genesis and exodus.
Linguists tell us languages are not created in an instant, but evolve over
years, casting doubt on the story of the tower of Babel.
It is clear to most people that the story of Noah is also
not meant to be taken literally. The huge number of problems with the logistics
of fitting the number of animals on an ark, combined with the science of
biogeography and other similar criticisms of the story, also show this story to
be figurative. The concept originally was perhaps based on a large flood in the
area at the time, adding to the knowledge of other such flood myths from other
cultures based in the same area, with the Noah story being passed down through
generations and combined with a story of God’s providence.
One of my favourite parts of the bible, the whole of the exodus
story, from Joseph being taken into Egypt to live under pharaoh and the Egyptians,
to Moses leading the Israelites out of Egypt into the Promised Land, is now
considered to be one huge metaphor and literary device. The evidence of this
coming from archaeology and the lack of a presence of a large society in the
area at that time, leading experts to believe that these were figurative,
non-literal stories told at the time and passed down, to express the oppression
of the Egyptian civilisation in the area during that time-frame.
“Cheated” or “betrayed” are perhaps a too strong or
emotional words to use to describe the feeling, but Church and Sunday school
preachers have a responsibility to inform themselves on the facts of the issue
which they are teaching to children. Myself and the generation of children in
my age group (and large amounts of others by which this misinformation is
continuing today) were ultimately let down on this issue.
I am not saying these adults misled children deliberately to
brainwash kids, (although the effect is largely the same, whatever the
intention and cause) but were simply ignorant of the issues themselves and
therefore saw no need to inject critical thinking of the bible verses they
already clung to, as truth, themselves. The leaders and teachers were nothing
but wonderful people during my years at church and I will never say a negative
word about their well-intentioned personalities and conduct. However, a wider
research and reading on the issues preached fell far short and it still does
today.
I’m sure as people read this, they will be disagreeing, out
of hand, with the large list of known metaphorical and non-literal stories in
the pages of scripture, showing the need to address the problem and educate. The
sheer number of events in the bible that formerly were taken to be historical
and now are accepted to not be, seems to deal a death blow to the tenants of
Christianity and large aspects of theology. If large amounts of scripture, such
as Adam and Eve, Moses and the Exodus, Noah and the tower of Babel be taken as figurative
and allegorical then why should the rest be taken as literal. This leads to
fundamentalist, literalist Christians having to jump through intellectual hoops
and deny large portions of the evidence which supports this, to escape the
consequences of these revelations, or as the only alternative, believe almost
the entirety of their bible is metaphorical and perhaps deny their faith
altogether- a step too far which they will not take.
The response of “We always thought these stories were figurative,
no one ever thought they were literal” I find to be intellectually dishonest. This
was never made clear in the years of me going to church and I wasn’t too young
to hear and understand this perspective if it ever was enunciated. This smacks
of back peddling in the light of new evidence given by science and archaeology
in the 21st century, to hold to the belief in the Christianity at
all costs, rather than jettisoning the belief as would be done with all over
ideas when evidence of this type comes along.
To also hold to the belief in the literal truth of these
bible stories and deny the evidence that shows these beliefs to be misguided shows
intellectual dishonesty. People should reject beliefs they hold when
conflicting evidence is discovered that casts them into doubt. I can often almost
see the thoughts in Christian’s minds as they happen, in real time, when
explained the evidence contradicts these events being literally true, as they
come to realise they would have to reject the whole of scripture and theology,
if they accept the evidence for these stories being metaphorical. What’s to
stop the entire bible being in the same category if some parts have been shown
to be metaphorical, they think, and so I can’t accept that any of it can be metaphorical.
It is also not my responsibly as an Atheist to try to work
out my theology and which parts I agree and don’t believe- this is for
Christians to work out amongst themselves. I neither sit on the “believe all
parts of the bible are literal” side of the coin, nor “most of it is figurative”
side, such as some very liberal theologians and vicars do. I have rejected the
entire bible as fundamentally untrue, despite some nice, useful parts, as an
atheist and this makes it far simpler.
It is clear what the bible writers were trying to do, in writing
these stories, by trying to explain the world to which they found themselves
in, thousands of years ago and we should not blame them for writing a figurative
story that Christians coming later mistook to be literally true. However,
people need to be told the extent to which many of the bible stories are not
considered to be literally true, so they can teach this perspective to children
and others in the church, to keep my experience of finding out years later from
happening over and over again.